3 Comments

  1. I’ve loved Alfie Kohn’s ideas since I read PUNISHED BY REWARDS 10 years ago.

    I have narrative reports. The students and I conduct personal conferences. I’d love to share these reports and conferences with parents in lieu of grades. I’m sad Alfie Kohn thinks SBG is “lipstick on a pig,” as I believe it is a step closer to better communicating with parents over one letter grade per quarter. Letter grades –> SBG –> narratives and conferences. I loved hearing his ideas. I’ll need to listen again. And again.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Joy,

      I actually agree with Alfie Kohn on this point. Though SBG is better than traditional grades, it is another way to rank and sort students, which diminishes the value of learning and it is another way to tell students they are not measuring up. As Guskey suggests, when we define an Exceeds Standards we are essentially creating a new standard. I also feel that when we define levels that are not meeting proficiency we are saying that these lower levels are acceptable just as an F grade is acceptable. If F’s are not acceptable, they why do we offer them?

      In my opinion, why not define what it means to demonstrate proficiency and expect students to meet that. Then, when we want to challenge students beyond proficiency we design feedback that challenges individual students where they are, or better yet, let the student define what it would mean to go beyond proficiency.

      Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s